WED MAR 26
11:30 PM
NJ
-225
CHI
T: 5.5
Preview
11:30 PM
VAN
T: 5.5
NYI
-120
Preview
THU MAR 27
2:00 AM
DAL
-150
EDM
T: 6
Preview
2:00 AM
BOS
T: 6
ANA
-120
Preview
11:00 PM
PIT
BUF
Preview
11:00 PM
UTA
TB
Preview
11:00 PM
OTT
DET
Preview
11:00 PM
MTL
PHI
Preview
11:30 PM
WSH
MIN
Preview
  • Why Cale Makar's goal against the Oilers was not ruled offside

    When Cale Makar picked off a pass, crossed the Edmonton Oilers' blue line and rifled a shot past Mike Smith at the end of the first period on Tuesday, the Oilers quickly challenged — because clearly Colorado Avalanche forward Valeri Nichushkin was offside... right?

    Not quite.

    Despite much of the hockey world expecting the goal to be overturned since Nichushkin was still in the Oilers' zone when the puck crossed the blue line, the officials came out after a lengthy review to announce the call stood. The play was onside, "we have a good goal," and the Avalanche took a 3-2 lead into the first intermission.

    So why did the goal stand? How was it onside? Here's an explanation.

    Makar's snipe on Mike Smith ruled onside after review
    Watch as Colorado Avalanche defenceman Cale Makar's goal stands after Edmonton Oilers' head coach Jay Woodcroft challenges for offside.
    Video Player is loading.
    Current Time 0:00
    Duration 0:00
    Loaded: 0%
    Stream Type LIVE
    Remaining Time 0:00
     
    1x
      • Chapters
      • descriptions off, selected
      • captions off, selected

        A delayed offside occurs when an attacking player(s) crosses the offensive blue line before the puck, but the defending team is in position to bring the puck out of the zone without delay or the attacking player(s) is in the process of exiting the zone.

        However, according to rule 83.3, the delayed offside violation can be nullified under two conditions:

        i) All players of the offending team clear the zone at the same instant (skate contact with the blue line) permitting the attacking players to re-enter the attacking zone, or

        ii) The defending team passes or carries the puck into the neutral zone.

        The rule goes on to explain that if, during the course of the delayed offside, "any member of the attacking team touches the puck, attempts to gain possession of a loose puck, forces the defending puck carrier further back into his own zone, or who is about to make physical contact with the defending puck carrier," the linesman will stop play for the violation.

        This possession condition of the rule carries significance for Makar's goal.

        As Makar intercepts the puck in the neutral zone, he then pushes the puck across the blue line with one hand, while Nichushkin is still in the Oilers' zone.

        However, according to the NHL’s ruling on the goal, pushing the puck forward did not constitute an attempt at gaining possession, and he does not actually cross the blue line and take control of the puck in the offensive zone until Nichushkin has tagged up and come back onside. Once Nichushkin was deemed to have properly exited the zone, Makar gained sufficient control of the puck for it to be considered possession, making his zone entry and ensuing goal onside.

        Why point of contact with puck determined Makar to be onside
        The Hockey Central panel breaks down Colorado Avalanche's Cale Makar's onside ruling on his first period goal in Game 1, discussing the point at which the defenceman contacts the puck across the blue line, and why it determined the call.
        Video Player is loading.
        Current Time 0:00
        Duration 3:10
        Loaded: 0%
        Stream Type LIVE
        Remaining Time 3:10
         
        1x
          • Chapters
          • descriptions off, selected
          • captions off, selected
          • en (Main), selected

          "It was determined that Colorado's Valeri Nichushkin legally tagged up at the blue line before Cale Makar entered the offensive zone with the puck on his stick. Makar made contact with the puck in the offensive zone after Nichuskin was in an on-side position," read an official explanation from the NHL.

          Either Makar is extremely lucky, or his hockey IQ is even further off the charts than we thought. What was his intention on the play?

          "I knew they were trying to get out of the zone. My instinct was to try to give them as much time as possible," Makar said after the game.

          Makar goal debate headlines wild start to Western Conference Final
          The Hockey Central panel breaks down a wild start to the Western Conference Final and goes into detail on the performance by defenceman Cale Makar, the controversy surrounding his goal, and what happened to the goaltending on both teams.
          Video Player is loading.
          Current Time 0:00
          Duration 4:25
          Loaded: 0%
          Stream Type LIVE
          Remaining Time 4:25
           
          1x
            • Chapters
            • descriptions off, selected
            • captions off, selected
            • en (Main), selected

            To add insult to injury, the Oilers received a penalty for the failed coach's challenge, and the Avalanche buried a goal on the ensuing power play early in the second period.

            "I didn't really get an explanation at that point. We felt the player had control of the puck, didn't know that there was an offside player. We thought it was the right move to challenge that call," Oilers coach Jay Woodcroft, a former NHL video coach himself, said of his failed challenge. "We still feel the player had control of the puck.

            "I think control is a discretionary thought process. It's not as if the player knew someone was tagging up, lifted his stick up, waited for it, and then went back. He's under full control. And anyone that's carrying the puck over a blue line, whether your stick is on the puck or not, that's debatable."

            NHL NEWS

            More Headlines

            COMMENTS

            When submitting content, please abide by our submission guidelines, and avoid posting profanity, personal attacks or harassment. Should you violate our submissions guidelines, we reserve the right to remove your comments and block your account. Sportsnet reserves the right to close a story’s comment section at any time.